there was total agreement on the position of the Sadar-i-Riyasat; Although the Sadar-i-Riyasat was chosen by state law, it had to be recognized as such by the Indian president before its installation; In other Indian states, the head of state was appointed by the president and, as such, his candidate, but the person who was to be appointed head had to be an acceptable person to the government of that state; No one who is not acceptable to the government can be pushed on the state as head of state. The difference in the case of Kashmir lies solely in the fact that Sadar-i-Riyasat is elected primarily by the legislative branch of the state itself, instead of being a candidate of the government and the president of India. With regard to the powers and functions of the Sadar-i-Riyasat, the following argument was made by mutual agreement on the Delhi agreement between King Tribhuvan, the Nepalese Congress and Ranas. The two provisions of the Delhi Agreement were: Delhi Agreement was a tripartite (verbal) agreement in Delhi following a reciprocal agreement between Ranas, the Nepal Congress Party and King Tribhuban. [Citation required] Kashmiri government officials texted with indian government officials and reached an agreement to approve key decisions of the Constituent Assembly of the J-K State. This agreement later became known as the Delhi Agreement, 1952. The main features of this agreement were: the 2007 Delhi B.S. Agreement is a very important historical event that has led to the progress of the anti-Rana movement. After King Tribhuvan fled to Delhi with the risk of his throne in Nepal, the agreement was held in Delhi in the mediation of the Indian government and the presence of the king, the congress badger and Rana`s representative. It is even a tripartite agreement. The following points are: among the inspirates, 195 Pakistani military officers detained in India have been identified as the main suspects of war crimes.
Pakistan insisted that they be released as one of its main demands. She urged several Muslim countries to refuse recognition of Bangladesh until the release of the 195 officers.  India preferred their repatriation to Pakistan. In the text of the agreement, Bangladeshi Foreign Minister Kamal Hossain said that although the agreement called for the repatriation of the Ursdu biharis to Bangladesh, the Pakistani government withdrew its promise to relocate the Community to Pakistan.  This led to the stateless Pakistani community stranded in Bangladesh. 21-10-2008 Bijuri, Dang Dear Shyam I received your letter in the first hour and I read shortly after lunch. I write about how I feel about the outcome of the revolution and the royal proclamation. Freedom fighters controlled many places one after the other. Ranas is ready to agree. The fight has been postponed. A tripartite contract was then signed between King Tribhuvan, the Nepalese Congress and the Ranas.
After this treaty, the rule of Ranas ended, and there would be a reign of the representatives of the people. Similarly, there would be a Council of Ministers of 10 ministries, including five from Congress and Ranas. After his arrival in Kathmandu, the late King Tribhuvan made a royal proclamation. He granted amnesty to all political workers and restored their property. Thus, in Nepal, the joint efforts of the king and the people created democracy in Falgun 7, 2007 B.S. Write to me as soon as you receive this letter. It is with the best wishes that Binu aims to resolve the humanitarian problems posed by the 1971 conflict and thus allow the vast majority of those mentioned in the Indo-Bangladesh Joint Declaration to travel to their respective countries, India and Pakistan have reached an agreement: the Delhi Agreement was a trilateral agreement concluded on 28 August 1973 between India and India. , Pakistan and Bangladesh were signed; and only ratified by India and Pakistan.  It allowed the repatriation of prisoners of war and interned officials held in the three countries after Bangladesh`s war of liberation in 1971.